Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Guardian Ad Litem

Says he thinks the Winkler's made decisions that were in the children's best interests and that any of us would have done the same thing. Thinks the trip to Disney World and items that were bought benefitted the kids.
Wishes "immediate needs" had been defined at the beginning. Never saw anything in excess. All things were done promoting what was in best interest of the children.

Direct accounting for life insurance and social security money.

Thinks remaining money should be paid into the court to avoid any other questions and issues.

Sees a difference between the two trusts that were set up. One was 100% for the kids while the other did not.

No comments: